Employing computation to overcome epistemic obstacles in physics education
Keywords:
computational thinking, computational physics, epistemic obstacle, fall with dragAbstract
While the mathematization of physics has been essential to its development, the dominant focus on continuous mathematics can act as an epistemological obstacle in certain educational contexts. This limitation arises when the conceptual frameworks used in teaching physics restrict students’ access to problems that require advanced mathematical tools, particularly differential calculus. In this work, we explore how integrating computation and discrete mathematics can help overcome such barriers, enabling alternative approaches to phenomena that are otherwise analytically inaccessible. As case studies, we examine projectile motion with air resistance, a classical problem whose analytical resolution is too complex for high school students, and the motion of planets around the Sun, whose dynamics are governed by central gravitational forces and are naturally suited to numerical simulation. By implementing the Euler method in a Python program, we are able to accurately simulate the motion using basic programming skills and simple algorithms. This computational approach not only yields reliable results, but also enhances conceptual understanding through dynamic modeling, simulations, and graphical representations. We argue that computation should be regarded not as supplementary content but as a central component of physics education, serving as a bridge between current scientific practices and classroom instruction. This shift also requires updating mathematics curricula to include discrete structures and logic, which would support students’ understanding of computational approaches in physics and other sciences.
Downloads
References
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Kampylis, P., Dagienė, V., Wastiau, P., Engelhardt, K., Earp, J., Horvath, M. A., Jasutė, E., Malagoli, C., Masiulionytė-Dagienė, V., & Stupurienė, G. (2022). Reviewing computational thinking in compulsory education: State of play and practices from computing education. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/px7w
Caballero, M. D., & Merner, L. (2018). Prevalence and nature of computational instruction in undergraduate physics programs across the United States. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020129. https://doi.org/gfszxm
Cabezas, M. (2021). Pensamiento computacional, educación STEM y la educación informática: cuestiones pendientes. Revista Sudamericana de Educación, Universidad y Sociedad, 9(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/px7p
Chabay, R. W., & Sherwood, B. A. (2015). Matter and interactions (4ª ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Chonacky, N., & Winch, D. (2008). Integrating computation into the undergraduate curriculum: A vision and guidelines for future developments. American Journal of Physics, 76(4), 327-333. https://doi.org/bt943z
Denning, P. J. (2017). Computational thinking in science. American Scientist, 105(1), 13-17. https://doi.org/px7q
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2016). The long quest for computational thinking. En Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 120-129). ACM. https://doi.org/f3vbxd
Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational thinking. MIT Press.
García, R. (2000). El conocimiento en construcción: de las formulaciones de Jean Piaget a la teoría de sistemas complejos. Gedisa.
Newman, M. (2013). Computational physics. Independent Publishing Platform.
Odden, T. O. B., Lockwood, E., & Caballero, M. D. (2019). Physics computational literacy: An exploratory case study using computational essays. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020152. https://doi.org/gr45j2
Riedel, M., Wolf, F., Kranzlmüller, D., Streit, A., & Lippert, T. (2009). Research advances by using interoperable e-science infrastructures: the infrastructure interoperability reference model applied in e-science. Cluster Computing, 12, 357-372. https://doi.org/bzb6jf
Skuse, B. (2019). The third pillar. Physics World, 32(3), 40-43. https://doi.org/px7r
Tipler, P. A., & Mosca, G. (2021). Física para la ciencia y la tecnología, Vol. 1A: Mecánica. Reverté.
Winsberg, E. (2010). Science in the age of computer simulation. University of Chicago Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mateo Dutra Shaw

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors will retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.
Authors may enter into separate, additional non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., depositing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a monographic volume), provided that the initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to disseminate their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the published work. (See The Open Access Effect).















