The State as an artifact in the presence of other technologies

Authors

  • Diego Zavalia Arturo Jauretche National University, Florencio Varela, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/prohistoria.vi40.1825

Keywords:

State, Political Representation, Technology, Federalist , Hobbes

Abstract

Technological development has the peculiarity that previous technologies not only serve as a condition for the emergence of new ones, but often incorporate the new ones themselves. The question that motivates this work is whether the State considered as an artifact also has this connection with other technologies, particularly with digital ones. We will analyze the problem through the thought of Hobbes and the Federalist to conclude with some reflections on political representation in the face of the massification of digital technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amar, A. R. (2012). America’s Constitution A Biography. Random House Publishing Group.

Bailyn, B. (2004). The Federalist Papers. En B. Bailyn, To begin the world anew: The genius and ambiguities of the American founders. Vintage Books.

Balzi, C. (2019). Introducción. Hobbes, T. Leviatán (pp. VII-CCVIII). Colihue.

Bobbio, Norberto (1992), Thomas Hobbes, Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Cipolla, C. M. (2010). Las máquinas del tiempo: Estudios sobre la génesis del capitalismo. Crítica.

Duso, G. (2002). Pacto social y forma política. G. Duso (Ed.), El contrato social en la filosofía política moderna (pp. 9-50). Leserwelt.

Gibson, A. (2019 Madison’s Republican Remedy: The Tenth Federalist and the Creation of an Impartial Republic. En J. N. Rakove & C. A. Sheehan (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the Federalist. Cambridge University Press.

Grau, L. (2010). Nosotros, el Pueblo de los Estados Unidos. La Constitución de los Estados Unidos y sus enmiendas: 1787-1992. Universidad Carlos III.

Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J. (2008). The Federalist papers. Oxford University Press.

Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J. (2015). El Federalista. Akal.

Hobbes, T, (2010). Elementos filosóficos. Del ciudadano. Hydra.

Hobbes, T. (2012). Leviathan. Clarendon Press.

Hobbes, T. (2019). Leviatán. Colihue.

Hobsbawm, E. J. (1998a). Industria e imperio. Ariel

Hobsbawm, E. J. (1998b). La era del capital, 1848-1875. Crítica.

Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures past: On the semantics of historical time. Columbia University Press.

Mayr, O. (2012). Autoridad, libertad y maquinaria automática en la primera modernidad europea. Acantilado.

Schatzberg, E. (2018). Technology: Critical history of a concept. The University of Chicago Press.

Siemers, D. J. (2019). Publius and the Anti-Federalists: “A Satisfactory Answer to all the Objections”? En J. N. Rakove & C. A. Sheehan (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the Federalist. Cambridge University Press.

Skinner, Q. (2003). El nacimiento del Estado. Editorial Gorla.

Tricaud, F. (1988). Hobbes’s Conception of the State of Nature from 1640 to 1651: Evolution and Ambiguities. G. A. J. Rogers, A. Ryan (Ed.), Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes (pp. 107-123). Clarendon Press.

Wood, G. S. (1998). The creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787. University of North Carolina Press.

Zarka, Yves Charles (1997), Hobbes y el pensamiento político moderno. Herder.

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Zavalia, D. (2023). The State as an artifact in the presence of other technologies. Prohistoria. Historia, políticas De La Historia, (40), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.35305/prohistoria.vi40.1825

Issue

Section

Articles. Special section