“It Was Not Even Necessary to Have Written So Much in Right”: Legal Argumentation of the oidor Sebastián Zambrana de Villalobos to Defend the Marriage of his Son in the Audiencia of Charcas’s Jurisdiction, 17th Century

Authors

  • Sergio Angeli National Scientific and Technical Research Council, University of Buenos Aires, Research Institute for the History of Law, Buenos Aires, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/prohistoria.vi27.1206

Keywords:

Audiencia (high Court of justice), Charcas, oidores (judges), juridical allegation, Zambrana de Villalobos

Abstract

The paradigm of the Spanish justice had the judges and their correct doings at its center, so that their unblemished conduct would safeguard the decisions made within the courts. This paper will analyze the legal argument of licenciado Sebastian Zambrana de Villalobos in favor of the marriage of his son with a distinguished lady from the Charqueña jurisdiction. The piece that drafted the hearer is a suggestive rhetorical allegation that uses the Ius Commune to escape the prohibitions settled in Madrid. A glaring example that aims to illuminate the social relations that Hispanic judges aspired to establish.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-06-01

How to Cite

Angeli, S. (2017). “It Was Not Even Necessary to Have Written So Much in Right”: Legal Argumentation of the oidor Sebastián Zambrana de Villalobos to Defend the Marriage of his Son in the Audiencia of Charcas’s Jurisdiction, 17th Century. Prohistoria. Historia, políticas De La Historia, (27), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.35305/prohistoria.vi27.1206

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.