THINGS SAID IN PASSING: «POLARIZATION», «POLITICIZATION» AND «PERONIZATION» LIKE SOFT CATEGORIES IN THE HISTORIOGRAPHY ABOUT FIRST PERONISM

Authors

  • Nicolás QUIROGA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35305/eishir.v3i7.290

Keywords:

peronism, historiography, politicization, populism, political history

Abstract

This article discuss different uses of the terms "polarization", "politicization" and "peronization" in historiography on the first Peronism (1945-1955). In order to contribute to debates that incorporate research on the first Peronist to larger fields of studies such as political parties or reflection on Latin American populisms, I explore the relationships between the concepts used and notions of politics involved in them, both the present of historians and the present of protagonists of the period. By identifying tensions between the uses of the concepts and advances in historiography as a whole, the article propose to discuss the idea of "adherence” as a way to change the valences of the terms laid down in discussion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

QUIROGA, N. (2013). THINGS SAID IN PASSING: «POLARIZATION», «POLITICIZATION» AND «PERONIZATION» LIKE SOFT CATEGORIES IN THE HISTORIOGRAPHY ABOUT FIRST PERONISM. Estudios Del ISHiR, 3(7), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.35305/eishir.v3i7.290